Though certain technological success had been made, it was political philosophy that eventually prevailed, which reminds me of some familiar experience in the ecnomics lessons that i learned almost ten years ago. Would a president adopt any logically pesuasive suggestion from economists or scientists, to get rid of possible man-made disasters? Sometimes, probably, but not quite much, basically on account of the balance, that's what history tells us about how rational elites play cards in politics, and history may not justify anyone. There's nothing to do with morality or nation's grudge or preferences or anything else. What's different is that Oppenheimer did change the rules of the game, rapidly into so-called 'Mutual Assured Destruction', a gloriouly intelligent but insanely dangerous concept, since the atom bombs burned an old world down in 1945, Japan. I suppose we are no more than survivors, one way or another.